🔗 Share this article

American legal authorities have stated that a Libyan suspect willingly admitted to being involved in attacks directed at US citizens, encompassing the 1988's Pan Am Flight 103 attack and an unsuccessful attempt to kill a American public figure using a explosive-laden coat.

Confession Information

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is reported to have admitted his involvement in the murder of 270 victims when Flight 103 was destroyed over the Scottish community of the region, during interviewing in a Libyan prison in the year 2012.

Referred to as the suspect, the elderly man has claimed that multiple hooded individuals pressured him to make the statement after intimidating him and his relatives.

His attorneys are trying to prevent it from being employed as proof in his trial in Washington next year.

Courtroom Dispute

In response, legal counsel from the American justice department have said they can prove in court that the statement was "unforced, credible and correct."

The presence of the suspect's purported confession was initially made public in 2020, when the US declared it was accusing him with building and priming the IED utilized on Flight 103.

Defense Claims

The defendant is accused of being a ex- colonel in Libya's intelligence service and has been in American confinement since recent years.

He has entered innocent to the charges and is due to appear in court at the District Court for the the capital in April.

Mas'ud's lawyers are attempting to prevent the trial from being informed about the statement and have submitted a motion asking for it to be withheld.

They argue it was secured under duress following the revolution which removed the former dictator in 2011.

Purported Coercion

They say previous officials of the ruler's government were being victimized with unlawful killings, abductions and torture when the suspect was abducted from his residence by weapon-carrying individuals the next time.

He was taken to an informal detention center where other inmates were allegedly assaulted and mistreated and was isolated in a small cell when multiple masked individuals handed him a solitary page of material.

His legal representatives claimed its scripted information began with an order that he was to admit to the Pan Am Flight 103 incident and an additional terror attack.

Substantial Terror Events

The defendant claims he was ordered to remember what it said about the occurrences and restate it when he was questioned by a different individual the next morning.

Fearing for his security and that of his family, he said he believed he had no alternative but to acquiesce.

In their response to the defense's motion, lawyers from the federal prosecutors have said the tribunal was being asked to withhold "highly significant testimony" of the defendant's culpability in "two major terror incidents targeting American people."

Prosecution Rebuttals

They say the suspect's account of occurrences is unbelievable and untrue, and argue that the contents of the statement can be supported by credible separate proof assembled over numerous decades.

The legal authorities claim the suspect and fellow previous officials of the former leader's intelligence agency were detained in a hidden detention facility managed by a faction when they were questioned by an experienced Libyan investigator.

They argue that in the disorder of the post-revolution period, the location was "the protected environment" for the suspect and the fellow personnel, given the violence and opposition feeling widespread at the time.

Interrogation Information

Based to the investigator who interviewed Mas'ud, the center was "properly managed", the inmates were not confined and there were no signs of abuse or intimidation.

The officer has said that over 48 hours, a confident and well Mas'ud explained his involvement in the explosions of the aircraft.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has also claimed he had admitted building a explosive which exploded in a Berlin venue in 1986, claiming the lives of several persons, including multiple American soldiers, and wounding dozens additional.

Other Claims

He is also alleged to have detailed his role in an plot on the lives of an unnamed American foreign minister at a official ceremony in the Asian country.

The defendant is said to have described that someone with the US official was wearing a booby-trapped overcoat.

It was the defendant's task to activate the explosive but he opted not to act after finding out that the man bearing the garment did not know he was on a deadly operation.

He opted "not to activate the device" even though his supervisor in the agency being with him at the moment and asking what was {going on|happening|occurring