🔗 Share this article

As a Dungeon Master, I historically shied away from heavy use of randomization during my D&D games. I tended was for story direction and what happened in a game to be determined by character actions as opposed to pure luck. Recently, I chose to change my approach, and I'm truly glad I did.

The Catalyst: Watching an Improvised Tool

An influential streamed game utilizes a DM who regularly calls for "luck rolls" from the participants. The process entails choosing a polyhedral and defining potential outcomes contingent on the roll. It's essentially no different from using a pre-generated chart, these are created spontaneously when a player's action has no clear outcome.

I decided to try this method at my own game, primarily because it looked engaging and provided a break from my normal practice. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the perennial balance between pre-determination and randomization in a roleplaying game.

An Emotional Session Moment

During one session, my party had concluded a city-wide fight. Afterwards, a cleric character asked about two beloved NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. Instead of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both died; a middling roll, a single one succumbed; a high roll, they made it.

Fate decreed a 4. This resulted in a profoundly emotional scene where the characters found the bodies of their friends, forever united in their final moments. The group conducted last rites, which was especially significant due to previous roleplaying. As a parting gesture, I chose that the forms were suddenly transformed, revealing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the item's contained spell was exactly what the group required to solve another pressing quest obstacle. You simply orchestrate such magical moments.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This experience led me to ponder if chance and thinking on your feet are truly the essence of D&D. Although you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Groups often take delight in upending the most detailed plots. Therefore, a skilled DM needs to be able to pivot effectively and create scenarios in the moment.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a great way to practice these abilities without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The key is to apply them for minor situations that won't drastically alter the overarching story. As an example, I wouldn't use it to establish if the main villain is a secret enemy. Instead, I could use it to decide whether the PCs arrive moments before a major incident occurs.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

Spontaneous randomization also helps keep players engaged and foster the sensation that the game world is responsive, progressing in reaction to their choices as they play. It reduces the sense that they are merely characters in a rigidly planned narrative, thereby strengthening the collaborative nature of storytelling.

This approach has historically been embedded in the original design. The game's roots were reliant on random tables, which made sense for a game focused on exploration. Even though current D&D often emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, it's not necessarily the only path.

Achieving the Right Balance

Absolutely no issue with thorough preparation. But, equally valid no issue with relinquishing control and permitting the whim of chance to decide some things in place of you. Authority is a big part of a DM's responsibilities. We use it to run the game, yet we frequently find it hard to cede it, in situations where doing so might improve the game.

My final suggestion is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Experiment with a little randomness for inconsequential outcomes. You might just find that the organic story beat is significantly more powerful than anything you could have pre-written in advance.