🔗 Share this article

The last time Vladimir Putin visited the South Asian nation in the previous decade, the global landscape looked entirely distinct. The brief visit, curtailed by the pandemic, focused on discussions on economic and military ties between the two nations.

Not long after, the full-scale invasion of Ukraine would turn the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that era preceded a major change in US-India relations, marked by contentious rhetoric and the introduction of substantial import duties.

"In this context, the importance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM is profound, serving as a symbol of enduring ties and a defiance of external pressure," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Two Major Powers

The high-level meeting takes place at a delicate moment. President Putin arrives after dismissing recent peace proposals for Ukraine, confident due to claimed gains by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this engagement is its simple happening," stated a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It indicates a return to a form of routine global diplomacy."

From Delhi's standpoint, the risks are particularly elevated. The country faces a difficult geopolitical climate, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a diminished Russia, and an assertive China.

This delicate balance was underscored just before the visit, when European ambassadors released a joint opinion piece questioning Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a sharp response from Indian officials, who labeled it an inappropriate diplomatic practice.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The India-Russia bond dates back to the Soviet period and remains deeply entrenched, with Moscow historically being Delhi's top defense supplier. This relationship was largely tolerated by the West until a recent shift.

Over time, Western nations ignored India's large-scale buying of cheap energy from Russia. Yet, in the wake of failed peace efforts, accusations increased, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"Consequently, India has returned to its traditional posture of 'hedging'," noted a foreign policy expert. "This demonstrates to the US that it has other choices and is waiting to see how the global dynamics settle."

Apart from global diplomacy, India's core motivation with Russia is geography. "Beijing remains the primary security challenge to India, and historically, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst added.

The strengthening Moscow-Beijing axis has caused concern in Delhi, leading to efforts to prevent an unbreakable bond between its northern neighbor and its traditional ally.

This apprehension has also accelerated India's drive to diversify its defense procurement, shrinking its dependence on Russian equipment from a dominant share to a reduced portion in the past few years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian arms to maintain the alliance, but avoid so dependent that a sudden cutoff would cripple its defenses," the analyst remarked.

The Oil Question

Enhanced trade relations is expected to be a major topic. President Putin has recently emphasized plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", in spite of Western sanctions.

The issue of energy purchases remains central. Although the Indian government has vowed to keep buying Russian oil, new sanctions have dampened activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has agreed to boost imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson acknowledged "hurdles" in economic cooperation but said it would proceed uninterrupted. The official minimized the effect of sanctions, stating they would cause only "insignificant" and "temporary" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "means" to circumvent them.

Diplomatic Constraints

When the two leaders sit down, the issue of Ukraine is likely to be addressed primarily through India's standard call for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader can speak to both sides, India does not possess the diplomatic clout to significantly influence the war," the analyst noted. "Beyond urging negotiations, its ability to make a difference is limited."

Ultimately, despite the visible friendship between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pragmatic strategic interest," guided by national interest in a rapidly changing world.